<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>[Ctoads] Latest 50 posts for topic: &lt;b&gt;KOOL-AID + ANTIQUITY = PATHETIC !</title>
    <link>http://www.ctoads.com/topics/show/330</link>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 23:05:33 GMT</pubDate>
    <description>[Ctoads] Latest 50 posts for topic: &lt;b&gt;KOOL-AID + ANTIQUITY = PATHETIC !.
9 posts total.</description>
    <item>
      <title>Food for thought.  I disagr...</title>
      <link>http://www.ctoads.com/topics/show/330#post_4099</link>
      <description>Food for thought.  I disagree.  I think one term is necessary to prevent sitting presidents from working on re-election instead of the business of the country.  </description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 23:05:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.ctoads.com/topics/show/330#post_4099</guid>
      <author>Barns</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title> And also neglected brewing...</title>
      <link>http://www.ctoads.com/topics/show/330#post_4082</link>
      <description> And also neglected brewing terrorist threats around the world that one could argue led to 9/11. But let's face it, no one is good enough to be president. We need more political parties and a broader conversation. We need dialogue, period. Instead, we get talking heads that never have to complete the discussion on any given topic. Instead they offer one sliver of the big picture and pass it off as a solution.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 19:16:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.ctoads.com/topics/show/330#post_4082</guid>
      <author>cac</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>I oppose term limits.  We s...</title>
      <link>http://www.ctoads.com/topics/show/330#post_4076</link>
      <description>I oppose term limits.  We should have the right to vote for whomever we feel is fit to run the government.  Would it have served the US right if Roosevelt was barred from running in 1940 or 1944? (hint - no) Would we be better off now if Bill Clinton had run and been re-elected in 2000 instead of W? (hint - yes)</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 16:37:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.ctoads.com/topics/show/330#post_4076</guid>
      <author>Backbiter</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Making a joke to make my po...</title>
      <link>http://www.ctoads.com/topics/show/330#post_4073</link>
      <description>Making a joke to make my point.  Sounds like a terrific idea.  Unfortunately, it will require a bureaucracy of many to administer.  Still not a bad idea.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 15:29:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.ctoads.com/topics/show/330#post_4073</guid>
      <author>harvard</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>So we can send in our choic...</title>
      <link>http://www.ctoads.com/topics/show/330#post_4072</link>
      <description>So we can send in our choices like Brad Pitt, Tom Brady, Kobe Bryant and Joe Lieberman?</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 15:27:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.ctoads.com/topics/show/330#post_4072</guid>
      <author>harvard</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>You on your side of the pon...</title>
      <link>http://www.ctoads.com/topics/show/330#post_4071</link>
      <description>You on your side of the pond are not the only ones with weightless choices. Maybe a one term limit of 4 to 6 years will serve you better.  Maybe you should have a pre-election to pick candidates you want to run.  I would fancy a write in system for many candidates the people want.  Then have a primary system to pick from the choices the people fancy.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 15:25:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.ctoads.com/topics/show/330#post_4071</guid>
      <author>rachee</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>And appears to have re-defi...</title>
      <link>http://www.ctoads.com/topics/show/330#post_4061</link>
      <description>And appears to have re-defined TEFLON for the rest of time.  &lt;p&gt;Yup.  He would likely get a massively winning percentage of the votes in 2008 ....</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 22:56:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.ctoads.com/topics/show/330#post_4061</guid>
      <author>Barns</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>And had more fun than anybo...</title>
      <link>http://www.ctoads.com/topics/show/330#post_4060</link>
      <description>And had more fun than anybody since U.S. Grant.  </description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 22:55:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.ctoads.com/topics/show/330#post_4060</guid>
      <author>Harm</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Bill Clinton.  Balanced Bud...</title>
      <link>http://www.ctoads.com/topics/show/330#post_4058</link>
      <description>Bill Clinton.  Balanced Budget, Budget Surplus, worked with a Republican Congress and still got stuff done, economy was great, the world liked him.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 22:18:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.ctoads.com/topics/show/330#post_4058</guid>
      <author>Backbiter</author>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
